EU digital governance – what money (alone) cannot buy

Bruno Saraiva [master’s student in European Union Law and Digital Citizenship & Technological Sustainability (CitDig) scholarship holder]

The stakes have never been higher. They could not have been lower. In today’s world, competition is no longer a byproduct of cohabitation but the very condition of survival – economic, diplomatic, military. And the arena of this competition is digital: data, computing, and the capacity to summon and shape the world’s resources at near-instant speed.[1] This is the new frontier of sovereignty and power. Against this backdrop, the European Union (EU) has wagered that funding, infrastructure, and regulation together – not raw scale alone – will secure its place in the digital age.

Funding as foundation

One must give credit where credit is due: the EU’s AI innovation package reflects a cohesive, participatory and integration-oriented approach. But it could always be more comprehensive. Going beyond mere funding and regulatory flexibility, it offers a coherent, structured approach that emphasises not only technological development but also the education and empowerment of potential users regardless of background – a crucial wellspring of transformation. The further technological advancement diffuses outwards from academic institutions and research centres into society, the greater their potential to generate transformative difference. This is because such fusion entails engagement with a wide range of issues, modes of thought, toolsets and problem-solving strategies, fostering a reflexive process that enriches both innovation and governance.[2] In this sense, diversity of contact and application operates as an engine of innovation, particularly when viewed through the lens of long-term economic development.

Continue reading “EU digital governance – what money (alone) cannot buy”

Looking identity in the eye: brief considerations on the frontiers of biometric data and identity

José Vegar Velho [Guest Lecturer at the School of Law of the University of Minho | Commissioner at the Portuguese Data Protection Authority (Comissão Nacional de Proteção de Dados – CNPD)]

On the 25th of March 2024, the Portuguese DPA – CNPD – issued a decision to temporarily limit the processing of biometric data relating to the processing operation for the collection of iris, eye, and face data in Portugal, that was being performed by a globally established private company, which, at the time, already had a direct impact on about 300,000 persons in said national territory.[1]

Such data was claimed to be the basis of a universal ID, to be used as proof of personhood and human condition, that is, establishing whether an individual is both human and unique – a digital ID.

This ID was presented as a global digital passport that guarantees people a way to preserve their privacy to authenticate themselves as humans online, in a world where intelligence is no longer a discriminator between people and AI.

Continue reading “Looking identity in the eye: brief considerations on the frontiers of biometric data and identity”